Showing posts with label Auckland Writers and Readers Festival. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Auckland Writers and Readers Festival. Show all posts

Friday, May 9, 2014

Remarkable...

It is my month of talking - May. If I am a little absent from my blog I apologise - I am darting hither and thither across the countryside and not sitting down at a desk as much as I usually do. I have remarked in the past that I could talk the hind leg off a donkey - apparently now I can also talk myself horse hoarse. I spent Thursday and Friday talking about creative writing and reading some of my books to the students at Remarkables Primary School in Queenstown, with a view to die for, and a tad more rain than I had anticipated. I talked about ideas, plotting, tone, language techniques and character development. We discussed rules for writing and how authors and illustrators work independently on a book. The children were terrific and I had a great time and was especially thrilled by the bright wee sparks who told me they couldn't wait to go off and write stories. Here are some pics from the visit



The school is in a very picturesque location:

Friday afternoon I headed back to Dunedin (via Christchurch) so I could take part in the Dunedin Writers and Readers Festival. I felt very privileged to be asked to join author, Sandy McKay and chair, Bridget Schaumann for a panel discussion on Historical YA fiction and this morning we chatted about our writing process, our own history and the backgrounds to our books. We talked about getting published, research and writing habits. I hope the audience enjoyed the session as much as I did. If you wonder whether I get nervous before these things, the answer is, yes, I do. I think nerves are a normal part of the public speaking business and are not necessarily a bad sign. They don't paralyse me or prevent me from doing the job, and to me are just indicative of the fact I am keen to give a good talk and provide useful information in a coherent manner. And once I begin, they go. I don't tend to worry about them.This evening I am off to hear Eleanor Catton talk and then on Monday I wing my way to Auckland for some more talking at the Auckland Writers and Readers Festival. I am currently resting my vocal cords. 

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

A(w)rf....

What a weekend. The Auckland Writers and Readers Festival outdid itself this year. There were big crowds. Events seemed well patronised. I went to three. And they were all terrific.

Friday night was a wee feast of YA writers. Paula Morris, Kate De Goldi, Libba Bray and Patrick Ness. They were seated at the table next to ours. I felt like a 16 year old fan girl. Each author read from a recent work.I found it fascinating on (at least) two levels. Fascinating to hear the work they read, fascinating to hear them read their work. I left feeling jealous of their opportunity to read their work aloud to an appreciative audience. Afterwards I queued to have my copy of 'A Monster Call's signed by the author. Big ups to the very generous Mr Ness who has a formidable memory. I was impressed, which was great because...

...on Saturday I went to Patrick Ness's session chaired by Kate De Goldi. He read from his new adult title The Crane Wife (It sounded good. I bought it). Then Kate and Patrick had the most interesting discussion. Well, Kate had done her homework and made smart prompts and Patrick, prompted, said very very interesting things. He talked about how goodness in a character isn't necessarily boring. "Goodness writes white," he said, (quoting Henry de Montherlant) and then disagreed and went on to demonstrate how the way good characters respond to different circumstances and events is just as interesting as how other characters react. He went on to reveal the complexity of other characters in the book and what inspired and informed them (including his own personality). He talked about the nature of story, and truth. About how we are always the stars of our own stories and when we describe events and experiences we talk from our own perspective which doesn't make our 'story' any less truthful, just a different truth compared with any other person telling the story of that same event or experience. He talked about the frustration of being asked about how he balances fact with fantasy in his stories. 'Balance' isn't the task at hand. Creating a story/ a truth that compels a reader to believe in what they read is what he aims for. No balancing required.

Someone in the audience asked him whether he thought of writing happier endings for his teen audience and Ness spoke of reading enough writing from teens themselves that demonstrated the depth of their fears, worries, sadnesses and depression. For teens their emotions are big and all encompassing. They are everything. Fail to acknowledge the depth of their feelings, resist addressing the issues important to them and they won't trust you or your writing. I liked that. Ness also talked about having a soundtrack for each book - Peter Gabriel's Mercy Street was the song associated with 'A Monster Calls' (sorry I can't recall the songs for the other books). There was more. He was very generous. And he was generous too when the session was over. After, getting The Crane Wife signed, I asked a bit more about the truth of the teen experience and what makes a book YA. I wanted to hug him when he said he believes children are self limiting and will just stop reading if they don't like or aren't ready for a particular story. This has been my philosophy all along.

There seemed to be a bit of a Kate De Goldi thread to my weekend as she was also part of the session I attended on Sunday: a talk on Dealing with Dementia between Kate and Helena Popovic, a doctor specialising in improving brain function. Both speakers have parents with dementia. They spoke about the realities of caring for someone with this degenerative condition. Popovic spoke of the benefits of light and nature for sufferers. Of keeping up social interactions and providing opportunities for those with dementia to feel like needed members of their community. She warned of not letting beliefs and misunderstandings about the condition influence interactions. Beliefs and misunderstandings can become self fulfilling prophecies. She wanted to ban the phrase 'senior moment'. Older folk are not necessarily more forgetful than younger folk but we become more conscious of how much we can't recall and talk ourselves into a decline. The doctor also talked about preventive measures. There were three key things. 1) Regular physical activity. 2) Social interaction is also important for cognitive health and 3) mental exercise. Its not enough to do crosswords or sudoku. We should provide ourselves with new mental challenges (De Goldi talked about brushing her teeth with her other hand) and learn new things. All good stuff. Both women expressed the difficulties of having to be carers of loved ones in cognitive decline. It was sobering and understandably emotional stuff.

Kudos to the organisers. I think the weekend was well run. There were plenty of interesting things on offer and plenty of happy looking punters. My only brickbat? It would be great if New Zealand writers/illustrators of children's and YA fiction and non-fiction got the chance to speak and read at these events sometimes. We also have interesting things to say to adult audiences. And in view of the fact that many adults buy and read YA and yes, gasp, children's books too, they would probably be pretty happy with hearing it read at such events as well.

Saturday, May 12, 2012

A Mind for Murder - AWRF: A review...

today - mother's day, after a breakfast of pikelets made for me by my middle child (excellent job Geneva, thank you) I hied myself off to the big smoke for an hour of discussion on the levels of violence in contemporary crime novels with, sensibly enough, crime novelists Greg McGee, Paul Thomas and Peter James, with Craig Sisterson as Chair. It is my lone Auckland Writers and Readers festival event this year. I wish I could have gone to more. Actually I wish there were more I wanted to go to. Last years Wordy Day out filled with YA writers was terrific. I felt sad it wasn't being repeated this year. Okay, I had wanted to attend the gala opening, but thursday is already enough of a stretch for us as a family without adding in an event which is, no matter how interesting or relevant to my writing life, still an indulgence. The Friday session with Eoin Colfer and Emily Rodda was appealing but 5.30 on a Friday is when I give a big sigh of relief that the rushing around for the week is over and I can pour myself something ruinous and dress in comfy trousers that should not be seen by the public at large. Enough said. So sadly it came down to one. I was not disappointed although lord knows I have been disappointed in the past. I always come away from these things with mixed feelings, uncertain about what compelled me to go in the first place, unsure what I am taking away. There are no insights about writing or the writers life that I have not heard before, even if they have been expressed in fresh ways. And if I want this kind of info I can tap my way to  a Titanic's load of epithets, advice and homily's online. I confess, while I do read some crime fiction, including by NZ authors (both women - one of whom was in the audience today) I hadn't read any of the participants books so I wasn't going as an ardent fan. But I am interested in this genre, both as a reader and a writer, and I am interested in the process of giving a talk and being a participant in a panel session. I want to do more of this in the future. I wanted to be up there today. I fancy their job.

Props to Craig Sisterson who was a great chair. I have seen some doozies in the past, even from some of NZ's most luminous spheres literary lights lites lights. Being intelligent and/or a writer doesn't make you a skilled chair. Greg McGee (aka Alix Bosco) replaced Jennifer Rowe (aka Emily Rodda - how appropriate for crime writers to have an alias)who had to head home due to illness in the family, and while McGee was interesting I missed the chance to have a female perspective on crime writing, especially as the issue of misogyny in the genre was raised. Today's discussion wended its way from the levels of violence in crime thrillers, the need for crime novels to explore the social connections that drive crime, through the elitisim of literary writing (and the presence or absence of a plot and what this signifies), how serial killers don't make the best antagonists in crime writing (although Hannibal Lecter would argue there are always exceptions), the importance of opening lines, first pages and last lines, how science and television are driving crime fiction away from the cosy mystery end of the spectrum and toward violence. There were anecdotes. I enjoyed the grumble about the snobbery of the literary writing community toward crime fiction. It definitely isn't just children's writers who feel this then?

As with any of these talks I always think of questions to ask as I slide in to the driver's seat for the drive home. Is a rise in graphic violence an attempt by authors to keep their novel novel and fresh? After all if crime novel's reflect society, how many different societal forces can there be driving crime? Is crime writing easier to sell overseas? Is it easier to sell overseas if its more graphic/ technologically up-to-date/ deviant? Did all the panellists have links to police or specialists working within crime or forensic detection to support their writing (as Peter James definitely did)? I guess I need to up-skill as a literary event participant so these questions turn up when I still have a chance to ask them.